|
|
Vigilance Bulletin No. 32, May 14, 2007
1) MUA 2007
elections - April 30 to June 14 MUA 2007 elections. April 30 to June 14 This year’s MUA elections have seen national officials Paddy Crumlin (National Secretary) and Jim Tannock (Deputy National Secretary) get elected unopposed. The same goes in Sydney for both Warren Smith (now Branch Secretary) and Glen Wood (Sydney Deputy Branch Secretary). For the remaining contested positions, Vigilance recommends the following: Sydney - Assistant Branch
Secretaries (Two officials to be elected) Vote for Paul McAlear plus one of the following: Paul Garrett or Lorraine Ryan. National - Assistant National
Secretaries (Two officials to be elected) Vote for any two of the three candidates listed above. Elect better officials - YES! But is that enough? Taking on the boss and defending
our rights and conditions. We all want the best officials for the job. So how
do we select them? Being staunch or having great public speaking skills is good. But the best gauge of how an official will perform is the politics they stand for. Both Paul McAlear and Warren Smith are members of the Communist Party. The party's Maritime Industry Program contains good working-class policies. Vigilance therefore recommends a vote for Paul McAlear, regardless of the differences that it has with the CPA. "They
all change their tune once they're elected" But the problem is not just the pressure of individuals. It is the fact that today's union leaderships form the base for a distinct union bureaucracy. This bureaucracy is well established, well paid, unaccountable and treat unions like their property. It develops material interests that separate them from the union ranks. This promotes the political outlook of compromise that is dominant among union leaders. Most officials prefer negotiating to trade off conditions instead of fighting to keep them. Many use their power to hold back, sell short, or sell out struggles. We need
to transform our union To transform the unions, the control of this bureaucratic layer must be broken. It must be replaced with the power of the rank and file membership and the broadest union democracy. Only when we really control our own unions will we be able to use them effectively to defend ourselves against employer and government attacks. For
a militant, democratic MUA For a militant, class
struggle approach to defending and improving wages and conditions Permanency, significant above inflation pay increases and a shorter working week (with no loss in pay and no trade offs) will only be won through industrial action campaigns. For a serious industrial
campaign against "WorkChoices" MUA leaders should not rely on Labor. They should instead be arguing for - and initiating - a campaign of nationwide strike action and frequent mass rallies to force John Howard to repeal his "WorkChoices" laws. For rank and file control
of the MUA We need yearly national and branch conferences with all decisions being binding on our officials. Branch committees must be expanded and meet monthly. Workplace meetings and elected strike committees to control all disputes. No automatic support
for Labor - democratise union political funding Kevin Rudd will only water down "WorkChoices". And the MUA still throws money at the Labor Party. Unionists must have the right to vote for or against donating and affiliating to Labor, another working class party or no party at all. Oppose the private profit
drive - fight for workers’ control The alternative to the domination of private and government corporations is the fight for workers' control. We need to progressively take the decision-making power out of the bosses’ hands. From union control of hiring and firing; to ending business secrecy by opening the books up for union inspection when they cry poor; to the nationalisation of the maritime industry under workers' control and beyond - this approach must become part of our union's militant agenda. Internationalism in
deeds - not just in words The war in Iraq, the "war on terror", anti-Muslim hysteria, denying workers from abroad the right to seek asylum - none of these policies are in our interests. Union members need to be convinced of this through persistent argument and debate - not just one off union resolutions. Rank &
file involvement is the key Only then will our unions be committed to the militant struggle needed to fight the attacks of both the bosses and the government. |
|











